'Principia' by Newton (2024)

Newton through the eyes of an amateur

'Principia' by Newton (1)

Isaac Newton’s Philosophiae naturalis principia mathematica is widely regarded as one of the most important publications in the history of science. His universal laws of motion and of gravity and his mathematical and empirical approach to physics would dominate scientific thinking for about two centuries. The reception of the first edition of the Principia (1687), especially on the Continent, was of crucial importance for the spread of Newtonianism beyond the British Isles. A new witness to this process is now being brought to light: a copy of the first edition of the Principia, annotated by the Amsterdam merchant, writer and amateur mathematician Adriaen Verwer. A man who deserves to be called the first continental Newtonian – although he did not always agree with the British scientist, and 'misused' him for his own purposes.

'Principia' by Newton (2)

Together with Albert Einstein (1879-1955), Isaac Newton (1642-1727) is the most famous icon of modern science. He owes his fame mainly to the three editions of his Philosophiae naturalis principia mathematica (Mathematic principles of the philosophy of the natural sciences)from 1687, 1713 and 1726.

The first edition of the Principia was not an immediate success however, and certainly nobody outside England took any notice of the revolutionary work. Except the Amsterdam merchant Adriaen Verwer(1654/5-1717).

Substantial comments on parts of the Principia

'Principia' by Newton (3)

Verwer bought his copy of the Principia immediately in 1687, and the remarkable thing is that we can witness how he processed Newton's mathematical hypotheses.The first edition of the Principia has 495 pages (besides the preliminary and closing pages), numbered 1-383 and 400-510 (384-399 are missing without loss of text). Of these pages, 190 are annotated, of which 35 only by underlining or arrows in the margin. The remaining 155 mostly contain one or two short annotations or references, but there are a few dozen pages to which Verwer had added substantial comments. At the end we find four handwritten pages with indices and some supplementary remarks.

Of the first edition of the 'Principia' around 250 to 400 copies were printed. Approximately 50 copies were meant for export to the Continent, recognisable by the imprint Prostant Venales apud Sam. Smith.

The versatile Verwer

Who was this Verwer, who had such an interest in the provoking mathematics of Newton? As the son of a Rotterdam Baptist merchant hegrew up in a tolerant social environment. In 1680 Verwer moved to Amsterdam and made a name for himself as a merchant, but also as a theologian, philosopher, linguist, mathematician and as an expert in the field of maritime law. In Verwer's head alarm bells started ringing when he read the new philosophers, for instance René Descartes(1596-1650) and especiallythe radical Baruch (Benedictus) Spinoza (1632-1676) who explained the world in such a mathematical way that there seemed no room left for God, Christianity and wonders.

Blaming Spinoza

In 1683 Verwer published his ’t Momaensicht der atheistery … een grondige wederlegging van de tegenstrijdige waen-gevoelens en in ’t bysonder van de geheele sede-konst van Benedictus Spinoza. (‘The face of atheism… a thorough refutation of the contradictory delusions and especially of the complete ethics of Benedictus Spinoza’).He blamed Spinoza for using abstract, hypothetical mathematics, not the applied mathematics which relate to the existing world, such as astronomy does. Verwer begins to make a name for himself in intellectual circles. If he reads the Principia, he sees the work as an extra weapon to use against what he sees asupcoming atheism.

'Principia' by Newton (4)

Verwer's notes in the Principia

Who loosely inspects Verwer’s notes cannot but notice that he is familiar with quite a number of prominent mathematicians and astronomers. In chronological order from Euclid and Archimedes to Verwer’s contemporaries, for instance Spinoza and Christiaan Huygens. The most frequently cited author is David Gregory.The most recent publication he quotes (on p. 251) is Charles Hayes, Treatise on Fluxions (Londen, 1704), in which Newton’s infinitesimal calculus is explained. All notes are in Latin, sometimes something is scribbled in Greek, and one or two times the notes are in Dutch.

Exactly when Verwer added his annotations is not clear, and judged by the ink and the writing this could be done at different times.It looks like he also kept notes in note books, as is shown from the annotations on pp.251, 273 (from1713), 374 en 375 (from 1713), in which he also refers to his corrections on Newton. Also the works by Gregory (p. 250) andRené-François de Sluse (p. 283) were analysed in this manner. Verwer did a serious and solid job and did his best to grasp the Newtonian mathematics.

'Principia' by Newton (5)

The contents of Verwer's annotations show that he made them before he laid his hands on a copy of the second edition of the Principia, published in 1713. However, there are references to the second and third edition (from 1726), for instance on pp. 39-41, but these were written after Verwer's death by an unknown hand. This is important information, because in this way we get a picture of how amateur mathematician Verwer processed the contents of the first edition of the Prinicipia. This is even more remarkable because no other first edition of the Principia has been annotated so extensively. This has led to new research into the reception of the first edition of the Principia in the Low Countries (see further Mojet 2016 - cf.Annotated Books Online; duch*eyne 2020).

Verwer's library under auction

Between 13 and 15 October 1723, Verwer's library was sold by auction in Amsterdam. There is no auction catalogue and we do not know who owned the annotated Principia after that date. On 27 February 1984 the book was included in the collection of the library of theKatholieke Theologische Hogeschool Amsterdam (KTHA) ((‘Catholic Theological Academy Amsterdam'). In 1999 Utrecht University Library acquired a part of that library.

Verwer's contribution to Newtonianism

It is generally known that Newton’s victory march on the Continent started with the publication of the second edition of the Principia in 1713. Mainly Dutch scholars were responsible for this success. Verwer and men from his network, in particularJean le ClercandBernard Nieuwentijthad already taken care of a fertile breeding ground for Newton's ideas, even though they used him as defence against the new philosophies of Descartes and Spinoza(Jorink and Zuidervaart 2012). Verwer'scentral and inspiring role through his versatility and network of scientists and researchers played a major part in this process. Therefore he may be regarded as the first continental Newtonian. Not bad for an amateur!

This is a summary (with some additions) of the internet publication by Bart Jaski,'Newton through the eyes of an amateur', published in April 2013

'Principia' by Newton (6)

Author: Bart Jaski, August 2020

  • 'Principia' by Newton (7)

    dr. Bart Jaski

    Information / Collection Specialist

    Curator

  • Bilt, Igor van de & Jan Noordegraaf (ed.),Adriaen Verwer,Letterkonstige, dichtkonstige en redenkonstige schetse van de Nederduitse tale. Uit het Latijn vertaald door A. Kluit naar de editie van 1707(Münster, 2000).
  • Cohen, F.,Newton en het ware weten(Amsterdam, 2010).
  • Cohen, I. Bernard, & Anne Whitman (ed.),Isaac Newton: ThePrincipia. Mathematical principles on natural philosophy: a new translation … preceded by a guide to Newton’sPrincipia (Berkeley, CA, 1999).
  • Driel, L.F. van, ‘Eene geauctoriseerde tale. Adriaen Verwer, koopman, jurist en taalliefhebber’. In:Voortgang. Jaarboek voor de Neerlandistiek13 (1992), p. 121-143.
  • duch*eyne, Steffen, ‘Adriaen Verwer (1654/5–1717) and the first edition of Isaac Newton’s Principia in the Dutch Republic’. In: Notes and records 74 (2020), p. 479-505.
  • Guicciardini, Niccolò,Reading thePrincipia. The debate on Newton’s mathematical methods for natural philosophy from 1687 to 1736(Cambridge, 1999).
  • Jongeneelen, Gerrit, ‘Disguised Spinozism in Adriaen Verwer’sMomaensicht’,In: Wiep van Bunge & Wim N. A. Klever (ed.),Disguised and overt Spinozism around 1700:papers presented at the international colloquium, held at Rotterdam, 5-8 October, 1994(Leiden, 1996), p. 15-21.
  • Jorink, Eric,Het boeck der natuere: Nederlandse geleerden en de wonderen van Gods schepping, 1575-1715(Groningen, 2004 (dissertatie); Leiden, 2006). English translation:Reading the book of nature in the Dutch golden age, 1575–1715(Leiden, 2010).
  • -----, ‘Honouring Sir Isaac, or, Exorcising the ghost of Spinoza’. In: Steffen duch*eyne (ed.),Future perspectives on Newton scholarship and the Newtonian legacy in eighteenth-century science and philosophy. 28 September 2007(Brussel, 2009), p. 23-34.
  • Jorink, Eric & Huib Zuidervaart, ‘“The miracle of our time” How Isaac Newton was fashioned in the Netherlands’. In: E. Jorink & A. Maas (ed.),Newton and the Netherlands. How Isaac Newton was fashioned in the Dutch Republic(Leiden, 2012), p. 13-65.
  • Koyré, Alexander & I Bernard Cohen (ed.),Isaac Newton’sPrincipia. 3 vols (Cambridge, 1971-2).
  • Emma Mojet, Early Dutch interest in Newtonian mathematics: Adriaen Verwer (1654-1717) and Newton’s usefulness. Master thesis, Universiteit Utrecht, 2016 (http://dspace.library.uu.nl/handle/1874/337543). Winnaar Dr. C. Louise Thijssen-Schoute scriptieprijs 2017 en Elsevier/Johan de Witt-scriptieprijs 2017.
  • Noordegraaf, Jan, ‘Amsterdamse kringen. Taalkunde en theologie rond 1700’. In: Fred de Bree, Marijke Spies & Roel Zemel (ed.), ‘Teeckenrijcke Woorden’ voor Henk Duits(Münster, 2002), p. 235-252.
  • Vermij, Rienk,Secularisering en natuurwetenschap in de zeventiende en achttiende eeuw: Bernard Nieuwentijt(Amsterdam, 1991).
  • -----, ‘The formation of the Newtonian philosophy: the case of the Amsterdam mathematical amateurs’. In:British journal for the history of science36 (2003), p. 183-200.
  • Verwer, Adriaen,’t Mom-aensicht der atheistery afgerukt door een verhandeling van den aengeboren stand der menschen, ervattende niet alleen een betoogh van de rechtsinnige stellinge; maer ook voornamentlijk een grondige wederlegging van de tegenstrijdige waen-gevoelens en in ’t bysonder van de geheele sede-konst van Benedictus de Spinoza(Amsterdam, 1683).
  • Westfall, Richard S.,Never at rest. A biography of Isaac Newton(Cambridge, 1980; paperback editie 1983).
'Principia' by Newton (8)
'Principia' by Newton (2024)
Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Edmund Hettinger DC

Last Updated:

Views: 6141

Rating: 4.8 / 5 (58 voted)

Reviews: 89% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Edmund Hettinger DC

Birthday: 1994-08-17

Address: 2033 Gerhold Pine, Port Jocelyn, VA 12101-5654

Phone: +8524399971620

Job: Central Manufacturing Supervisor

Hobby: Jogging, Metalworking, Tai chi, Shopping, Puzzles, Rock climbing, Crocheting

Introduction: My name is Edmund Hettinger DC, I am a adventurous, colorful, gifted, determined, precious, open, colorful person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.